Button Ads!         



                  GrowStoreFinder.com Grow Shop Directory            1-15-2014                              GreenBookPages.com Grow Shop’s Directory Product Reviews 
         Local grow shops and hydroponic store locator with reviews                      
Find Local Hydroponics Shops and Grow Stores.   10-10-14  
Mega Text Ad’s Spaces Available! 
                                                                                   Advertise On All 3 Of Our Marijuana Websites   


  We Update Daily!

Chris S. Kenoyer. Owner
MMJ Patient, Medical Activist,
Online Patients Advocate, 
Online MMJ News Journalist 

My Medical Bio 

Follow Us Now On Twitter


Or Follow Us Now
  On Facebook

        Email Us Here

Or Email Us Securely Here
NEW 100% Encrypted Email Server

OLP’s Free MMJ News EList  
Get The Latest In MMJ News

Press Contact Info

 Is CBD?  A Possible Cure For
Breast Cancer..? And All The Other
Many Forms & Types Of Cancer..?
Learn More About CBD Here


Advertise Here On OnlinePot
Rates As Low As  $50 a Year
24/7 – 365 Days A Year Of Sales! 


Website Navigational Links

Main Start Page 2


Latest Marijuana News Reports


Parody’s Cartoons US 
Government Grown Pot,
Term Papers, School 
Reports, & Thesis’s On  
Marijuana & Cannabis


Amsterdam A to Z


Canadian Marijuana Websites


Church’s & Pot Cannabis


Co-Ops, Clinics, Dispensary’s 


Marijuana Doctors & Clinics 


Pot Cooking Recipes


Drug Testing A To Z


Pot Games


Pot Songs Video’s


100’s Of Grow Guides  


Hash A- Z


Cannabis Legal Info, Drug 
Lawyers, State, Federal Laws, 
State  & Supreme Court Rulings


POW’s Of The MMJ War!


Other Marijuana Websites 
Reciprocal Link Exchange


Medical Marijuana Studies, 
Research Report’s, Medical
Cannabis Clinic Study’s


Parody’s & Cartoons  
When We All Need A Good Laugh!  


Avoiding Online MOM Scammers
Newly Re-Updated Info!


The Politics Of Contraband 
Medical Marijuana In The Mail?


The Hall Of Shame Section
The Online MOM Scammers 


Online MOM Providers Ads


Politicians & Voters Rights


Medical Marijuana, Strains 


The OG  Marijuana Strain Guide


800+ FAQ Growing Questions


Patients Spiritual Guidance,
Free Online Crisis Help Center


Online Marijuana Seed Banks


Maximum Security Section 
      Just Updated!    


Traveling Tips, Guides, B & B’s


Vaporizers A To Z


Online Pot Video’s & Movies


Please Visit Both Of Our Sister Websites!

Maine Patients Coalition.org

The Reefer Madness Teaching Museum.org 

Listen Right Here Online! 
To Original 1930-1950’s
Reefer Madness Propaganda 
Radio Shows And Programs
Before TV There Were 
"Radio Stars"





Legal Disclaimer

Guest Book

Translate Text or Web Page Go To:
Language Tools Google Translations

Article Submissions &  News
Reports Are Always Gladly
Accepted Here.


No part of this site maybe used or
reproduced in whole or in part
without the written consent of the
Copyright Owner

1999-2014 Copyright
© All rights reserved

OnlinePot assumes no legal liability for any products, or information or  
news posted, services offered,  Or
any contests or give away’s offered.



 Supreme Court to revisit use of dogs as basis for drug searches


In two Florida cases, the court will decide whether a police dog’s alert is cause for searches.
 Some caution against using canines in place of search warrants.


            Return To OnlinePot’s Legal Section Main Page  


     Allison Margolin: Drug Dog Sniff Ruling Doesn’t Smell So Bad After All. Read PDF
             US Supreme Court Ruling On "Florida VS. Harris" 2013 DJDAR  229  Feb 22nd 2013

Drug Dog Legal Defenses Class In General Thoughts And Arguments

Handlers’ beliefs influence drug-sniffing dogs’ performance

US IL: Drug-sniffing Dogs In Traffic Stops Often Wrong! Legal Section

Florida Appeals Court Restricts Warrantless Drug Dog Searches



Passing along the transcripts from today’s oral arguments at the U.S. Supreme Court in the 2 cases from Florida involving drug sniffing dogs.

First is case 11-564, Florida v. Jardines (78 pages) @ http://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/11-564.pdf

Second is case 11-817, Florida v. Harris (64 pages) @ http://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/11-817.pdf

The argument audio for both cases will be posted Friday afternoon @ http://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_audio.aspx

By David G. Savage, Washington Bureau

October 31, 2012

WASHINGTON — Researchers at UC Davis set up a simple experiment to test police dogs and their fabled ability to detect drugs. They told 18 police
 dog handlers they had hidden small amounts of illegal drugs in four rooms of a church.

Over two days of testing, the drug-sniffing dogs alerted their handlers repeatedly and in every room — 225 times in all. And they were twice as likely
 to alert on spots marked with red construction paper that the handlers had been told would indicate drugs.

But in fact, no drugs were in any of the rooms, suggesting the "handler’s beliefs" and their "hidden cues" may trigger the dog to alert on a target of
 suspicion, the researchers said.

On Wednesday, the U.S. Supreme Court will revisit the constitutionality of using police dogs to trigger searches of cars and homes in a pair of
 cases from Florida. The justices will decide whether the 4th Amendment’s ban on "unreasonable searches" requires the police to have more than
 an alert from a drug-sniffing dog before they open the trunk of a car or enter a home.

Nationwide, dogs are the leading weapon in the government’s war on drugs. Florida alone has more than 1,000 K-9 units, and they were
 responsible for more than 130,000 arrests last year.

In the past, the high court has given the police a green light to conduct searches whenever a "well-trained narcotics detection dog" gives an alert.
 No one disputes that canines have an extraordinary ability to detect odors, and they can be invaluable in finding items such as hidden explosives
 or human remains.

But some experts in animal science are urging the justices to be cautious before allowing police dogs to serve as a substitute for search warrants.

Alerts from drug-detecting dogs "should be viewed with a healthy skepticism," said Auburn University professor Lawrence J. Myers, who has
 studied canines for decades. He said some dogs and their handlers were highly reliable, while others were not.

The UC Davis study "got an enormous reaction in the field," he said, because it showed the handlers, not the dogs, may be responsible for some of
 the alerts. "This is a major problem, and we’ve known it for a long time. The behavior of the handler affects the behavior of the animal," he said.

But Florida prosecutors and police dog handlers say that evidence of a dog’s good training and certification should be enough to demonstrate their
 reliability. "If a dog is tested in a controlled setting, you know if the dog is wrong or right," said Arthur Daus, a lawyer for the National Police Canine

Last year, the Chicago Tribune reported on data from several suburban police districts, which found only 44% of the car searches that were
 triggered by an alert from sniffer dogs resulted in the discovery of drugs or drug paraphernalia in the vehicle.

Police officers usually discount these "false" alerts, suggesting they are probably triggered by "residual odors" in the vehicle. The dog may have
 detected the odor of marijuana or cocaine that had been kept in the trunk weeks before, they say.

But Myers said experiments in a controlled environment — like the church in the UC Davis study — also found some dogs and their handlers were
 wrong more often than right in detecting narcotics.

Last year, the Florida Supreme Court said it was not convinced drug-sniffing dogs were always reliable enough to justify searches of cars on the
 highway. "There is no uniform standard in this state or nationwide for acceptable level of training, testing or certification for drug-detection dogs,"
 the state justices said. And the "potential for false alerts and for handler error" means that innocent motorists may be subjected to embarrassing
 searches, they said.

To justify a search that is triggered by a drug-sniffing dog, the police must furnish a trial judge with the canine’s "field performance records,
 including any unverified alerts," as well as evidence of its training and certification, the state justices said.

The case to be heard Wednesday began when a police officer went on patrol near Tallahassee with "his K-9 partner Aldo," a German shepherd. 
The officer stopped a pickup with an expired tag. The nervous motorist, Clayton Harris, refused to permit a search of his truck.

After Aldo circled the vehicle and alerted next to a door, the officer said he had probable cause to search inside. He found a bag of
 pseudoephedrine pills, thousands of matches and other ingredients for making methamphetamine.

Harris pleaded no contest to the drug charges, but the state justices ruled the search of his truck was unconstitutional because the police had not
 furnished objective evidence of Aldo’s reliability.

In a second case, the Florida court overturned the conviction of a Miami man for growing marijuana in his house. An officer had taken a
 drug-sniffing dog to the man’s front porch, and the alert furnished the probable cause to obtain a search warrant.

However, the Supreme Court agreed to hear appeals from Florida’s attorney general in the cases, Florida vs. Harris and Florida vs. Jardines.

Kenneth Furton, a chemist at Florida International University in Miami, led a group of scientists who studied police dogs. He said it was not good
 enough to allow police agencies to test their own dogs.

A dog and his handler must be tested on multiple vehicles, and "they need to be correct nine out of 10 times," he said.