Button Ads!         



                  GrowStoreFinder.com Grow Shop Directory            1-15-2014                              GreenBookPages.com Grow Shop’s Directory Product Reviews 
         Local grow shops and hydroponic store locator with reviews                      
Find Local Hydroponics Shops and Grow Stores.   10-10-14  
Mega Text Ad’s Spaces Available! 
                                                                                   Advertise On All 3 Of Our Marijuana Websites   


  We Update Daily!

Chris S. Kenoyer. Owner
MMJ Patient, Medical Activist,
Online Patients Advocate, 
Online MMJ News Journalist 

My Medical Bio 

Follow Us Now On Twitter


Or Follow Us Now
  On Facebook

        Email Us Here

Or Email Us Securely Here
NEW 100% Encrypted Email Server

OLP’s Free MMJ News EList  
Get The Latest In MMJ News

Press Contact Info

 Is CBD?  A Possible Cure For
Breast Cancer..? And All The Other
Many Forms & Types Of Cancer..?
Learn More About CBD Here


Advertise Here On OnlinePot
Rates As Low As  $50 a Year
24/7 – 365 Days A Year Of Sales! 


Website Navigational Links

Main Start Page 2


Latest Marijuana News Reports


Parody’s Cartoons US 
Government Grown Pot,
Term Papers, School 
Reports, & Thesis’s On  
Marijuana & Cannabis


Amsterdam A to Z


Canadian Marijuana Websites


Church’s & Pot Cannabis


Co-Ops, Clinics, Dispensary’s 


Marijuana Doctors & Clinics 


Pot Cooking Recipes


Drug Testing A To Z


Pot Games


Pot Songs Video’s


100’s Of Grow Guides  


Hash A- Z


Cannabis Legal Info, Drug 
Lawyers, State, Federal Laws, 
State  & Supreme Court Rulings


POW’s Of The MMJ War!


Other Marijuana Websites 
Reciprocal Link Exchange


Medical Marijuana Studies, 
Research Report’s, Medical
Cannabis Clinic Study’s


Parody’s & Cartoons  
When We All Need A Good Laugh!  


Avoiding Online MOM Scammers
Newly Re-Updated Info!


The Politics Of Contraband 
Medical Marijuana In The Mail?


The Hall Of Shame Section
The Online MOM Scammers 


Online MOM Providers Ads


Politicians & Voters Rights


Medical Marijuana, Strains 


The OG  Marijuana Strain Guide


800+ FAQ Growing Questions


Patients Spiritual Guidance,
Free Online Crisis Help Center


Online Marijuana Seed Banks


Maximum Security Section 
      Just Updated!    


Traveling Tips, Guides, B & B’s


Vaporizers A To Z


Online Pot Video’s & Movies


Please Visit Both Of Our Sister Websites!

Maine Patients Coalition.org

The Reefer Madness Teaching Museum.org 

Listen Right Here Online! 
To Original 1930-1950’s
Reefer Madness Propaganda 
Radio Shows And Programs
Before TV There Were 
"Radio Stars"





Legal Disclaimer

Guest Book

Translate Text or Web Page Go To:
Language Tools Google Translations

Article Submissions &  News
Reports Are Always Gladly
Accepted Here.


No part of this site maybe used or
reproduced in whole or in part
without the written consent of the
Copyright Owner

1999-2014 Copyright
© All rights reserved

OnlinePot assumes no legal liability for any products, or information or  
news posted, services offered,  Or
any contests or give away’s offered.





           Return To OnlinePot’s Legal Section Main Page       


   How To Hide From Airborne Infrared Flair Detection Devices

The Basics Of Thermal Imaging Heat Detection FLIR Camera’s



WASHINGTON ( AP ) – Police violate the Constitution if they use a heat-sensing device to
 peer inside a home without a search warrant, the Supreme Court ruled Monday.

An unusual lineup of five justices voted to bolster the Fourth Amendment’s protection against unreasonable searches and threw out an Oregon man’s conviction for growing marijuana.

Monday’s ruling reversed a lower court decision that said officers’ use of a heat-sensing device was not a search of Danny Lee Kyllo’s home and therefore they did not need a search warrant.

In an opinion written by Justice Antonin Scalia ( news – web sites ), by many measures the most conservative member of the court, the majority found that the heat detector allowed police to see things they otherwise could not.

"Where, as here, the government uses a device that is not in general public use to explore details of the home that would previously have been unknowable without physical intrusion, the surveillance is a ‘search’ and is presumptively unreasonable without a warrant," Scalia wrote.

While the court has previously approved some warrant less searches, this one did not meet tests the court has previously set, Scalia wrote.

The decision means the information police gathered with the thermal device – – namely a suspicious pattern of hot spots on the home’s exterior walls – cannot be used against Kyllo.

The court sent the case back to lower courts to determine whether police have enough other basis to support the search warrant that was eventually served on Kyllo, and thus whether any of the evidence inside his home can be used against him.

Justices Clarence Thomas ( news – web sites ), David H.  Souter, Ruth Bader Ginsburg ( news – web sites ) and Stephen Breyer ( news – web sites ) joined the majority.

Justice John Paul Stevens ( news – web sites ) wrote a dissenting opinion joined by Chief Justice William H.  Rehnquist, and Justices Sandra Day O’Connor ( news – web sites ) and Anthony M.  Kennedy.

At issue was how modern police technology fits into the court’s long line of decisions on what should be considered a search requiring a court warrant.

Last year, the Supreme Court ruled that police must get bus passengers’ consent or a search warrant before squeezing their luggage to see if drugs might be inside.  The court also requires a warrant to put a "bug" in someone’s home or in a telephone booth.

But the justices have said police do not need a warrant to go through someone’s garbage left on the curb, fly over a backyard to see what is on the ground, or put a beeper on a car to make it easier to follow.

Kyllo was arrested in January 1992 and charged with growing marijuana at his home in Florence, Ore.

Police had been investigating his neighbor, but they focused on him after they trained a thermal imaging device on his home and saw signs of high-intensity lights.  Using those images, electricity records and an informant’s tip, police got a warrant and searched Kyllo’s home, finding more than 100 marijuana plants.

Kyllo contended the marijuana plants could not be used as evidence against him because the police did not have a search warrant when they used the heat-sensing device.  A judge ruled against him, and Kyllo pleaded guilty on condition he could appeal the search issue.

The 9th U.S.  Circuit Court of Appeals ( news – web sites ) upheld the use of the device, saying it should not be considered a search.

During arguments at the Supreme Court in February, Kyllo’s lawyer told the justices that people should feel free to let down their guard at home without fear of the government unreasonably looking over their shoulder.

The Justice Department ( news – web sites ) contended the heat-sensing device did not intrude on Kyllo’s home but instead passively detected the heat that escaped from it, and the court’s dissenters apparently agreed.

Police gathered only information available on the outside walls, and used "a fairly primitive" device to do so, Stevens wrote.

Using the Thermovision device "did not invade any constitutionally protected interest in privacy," Stevens wrote.

The case is Kyllo v.  U.S., 99-8508.