|
We Update
Daily!
Custom Search
Chris S. Kenoyer. Owner
MMJ Patient,
Medical Activist,
Online Patients Advocate,
Online News Journalist
My
Personal Medical Bio
Follow Us Now On Twitter
@MedicalMMJMan
Email Us Here
olpwebs@yahoo.com
Or
Email Us Securely Here
olpwebs@Safe-mail.net
TV,
News, Press, Contact Info
********************************
Advertise Here
On OnlinePot
Rates As Low As $50 a Year
24/7 - 365 Days A Year
Of Sales!
*******************************************
Website Navigational Links
Main
Start Page 2
*******************************************
Parody's
Cartoons US
Government Grown Pot,
Term Papers,
School
Reports, & Thesis's On
Marijuana & Cannabis
*******************************************
Amsterdam
A to Z
*******************************************
Canadian
Marijuana
Websites
*******************************************
Church's
& Pot Cannabis
*******************************************
Co-Ops, Clinics, Dispensary's
*********************************************
Marijuana
Doctors & Clinics
*******************************************
Pot
Cooking Recipes
*******************************************
Drug
Testing A To Z
*******************************************
Pot Games
*******************************************
100's
Of Grow Guides
*******************************************
Latest
Marijuana News Reports
*******************************************
Hash A- Z
*******************************************
Cannabis
Legal Info, Drug
Lawyers, State, Federal Laws,
State
& Supreme Court Rulings
*******************************************
POW's
Of The MMJ
War!
*******************************************
Other
Marijuana Websites
Websites
Link
Exchange!
*******************************************
Medical
Marijuana
Studies,
Research
Report's, Medical
Cannabis Clinic Study's
*******************************************
Avoiding Online MOM
Scammers
Newly
Re-Updated Info!
*******************************************
The Politics Of
Contraband
Medical Marijuana In The Mail?
*******************************************
The
Hall Of Shame Section
The Online MOM Scammers
*******************************************
Online
MOM Providers Ads
*******************************************
Politicians
&
Voters Rights
*******************************************
Medical
Marijuana, Strains
*******************************************
The OG
Marijuana Strain Guide
*******************************************
800+
FAQ Growing Questions
*******************************************
Patients
Spiritual
Guidance,
Free Online
Crisis Help Center
*******************************************
Online
Marijuana Seed Banks
*******************************************
Maximum Security
Section
Just Updated!
*******************************************
Traveling
Tips, Guides, B & B's
*******************************************
Vaporizers
A To Z
*******************************************
Online Pot Video's & Movies
*******************************************
Please
Visit Our Sister Websites!
Maine
Patients Coalition.org
Reefer Madness Teaching
Museum.org
Listen Right Here Online!
To Original 1930-1950's
Reefer Madness Propaganda
Radio
Shows And Programs
Before TV There Were
"Radio Stars"

STOP SOPA!
********************************
OnlinePot Free Newsletter
The
Latest In MMJ News
Legal
Disclaimer
Guest Book
Translate text or web page go
to:
Language Tools
Google
Translations
Submissions & News Reports
Are Always
Gladly Accepted Here.
Is CBD? A Possible
Cure For
Breast Cancer?
And All The Other
Many
Forms & Types
Of Cancer?
Learn
More About " CBD" Here
Cancer Cured? A Cannabis Story

1999-2012 Copyright ©
All Rights Reserved.
No part of this site maybe used or
reproduced in whole or in part
without
the written consent of the
Copyright
Owner Chris Kenoyer
www.onlinepot.org
OnlinePot assumes no legal
liability
for
any products, or
information or
news
posted, services
offered,
Or
any contests or give away's offered.
| |
Issued: July 7, 2010
Return
To OnlinePot's Legal Section Main Page
Changes
to Maine medical marijuana program coming; all patients must register By Jan 1st
2011
Question
Bar Counsel asks the Commission to render an opinion concerning the general
parameters within which an attorney may, consistent with the Maine Rules of
Professional Conduct, represent or advise clients under Maine’s new Medical
Marijuana Act.
Maine recently enacted legislation permitting the creation of dispensaries for
the purpose of providing qualified patients with marijuana for medical
treatment. Questions have arisen regarding the role which Maine attorneys may
ethically play because of the interplay of Maine’s new law with the Federal
prohibition against the distribution of marijuana. This issue has been made more
problematic by the guidance, dated October 19, 2009, of the current United
States Deputy Attorney General, David W. Ogden. Ogden’s memorandum (“the
memorandum”) directs the United States Attorneys:
As a general matter, pursuit of [illegal drug prosecution] priorities should not
focus federal resources in your States on individuals whose actions are in clear
and unambiguous compliance with existing state laws providing for the medical
use of marijuana.
The memorandum, however, makes clear that the Federal law against the
distribution of marijuana is still in effect. It recognizes that “no State can
authorize violations of federal law” and that
This guidance regarding resource allegation does not ‘legalize’ marijuana or
provide a legal defense to a violation of federal law, nor is it intended to
create any privileges, benefits, or rights, substantive or procedural,
enforceable by any individual, party or witness in any administrative, civil or
criminal matter.
The issue, then, is whether and how an attorney might act in regards to a client
whose intention is to engage in conduct which is permitted by state law and
which might not, currently, be prosecuted under federal law, but which
nonetheless is a federal crime. Indeed, the memorandum notes that “the
prosecution of commercial enterprises that unlawfully market and sell marijuana
for profit continues to be an enforcement priority of the Department” and that
nothing therein “precludes investigation or prosecution where there is a
reasonable basis to believe that compliance with state law is being invoked as a
pretext for the production or distribution of marijuana for purpose not
authorized by state law.”
Opinion
The ethical framework governing lawyer conduct, the Maine Rules of Professional
Conduct, states clearly that:
A lawyer shall not counsel a client to engage, or assist a client, in conduct
that the lawyer knows is criminal or fraudulent, but a lawyer may discuss the
legal consequences of the proposed course of conduct with a client and may
counsel or assist a client to make a good faith effort to determine the
validity, scope, meaning or application of the law. M. R. Prof. Conduct 1.2 (e)
Here, the proposed client conduct is known to be a violation of federal criminal
law. In those circumstances, the role of the attorney is limited. While
attorneys may counsel or assist a client in making good faith efforts to
determine the validity, scope, meaning or application of the law, the Rule
forbids attorneys from counseling a client to engage in the business or to
assist a client in doing so. The limitation is highlighted by the 2009 Comment
[9]: to M. R. Prof. Conduct 1.2:
There is a critical distinction between presenting an analysis of legal aspects
of questionable conduct and recommending the means by which a crime or fraud
might be committed with impunity.
Maine and its sister states may well be in the vanguard regarding the medicinal
use and effectiveness of marijuana. However, the Rule which governs attorney
conduct does not make a distinction between crimes which are enforced and those
which are not. So long as both the federal law and the language of the Rule each
remain the same, an attorney needs to perform the analysis required by the Rule
and determine whether the particular legal service being requested rises to the
level of assistance in violating federal law. It is worth noting that there is
no guarantee that, with a change in policy, administration, or resources, the
federal law might ultimately be enforced to the chagrin of lawyers whose conduct
enabled the dispensaries. Even under the present policy, it is a situation where
potential clients may ultimately, if not initially, use the medical dispensary
and state law as a pretext for other more lucrative ventures.
Where the line is drawn between permitted and forbidden activities needs to be
evaluated on a case by case basis. Bar Counsel has asked for a general opinion
regarding the kind of analysis which must be undertaken. We cannot determine
which specific actions would run afoul of the ethical rules. We can, however,
state that participation in this endeavor by an attorney involves a significant
degree of risk which needs to be carefully evaluated.
|