|
We Update
Daily!
Everything That A Sick Patient
Needs
To Know And Learn
About Medical Marijuana!
Is Right
Here At OnlinePot
******************************
Custom Search
******************************
Chris S. Kenoyer. Owner &
MMJ Patient,
Medical Activist,
Online Patients Advocate,
Online News Journalist
And News Reporter
My
Personal Medical Bio
Email Us Here
olpwebs(AT)yahoo.com
Or Email Securely
Here
olpwebs(AT)hush.ai
*************************************
Do you have a site or business
targeted to the Cannabis
Scene? Get Noticed Here!
24/7 365 Days A Year Sales
5.05+ Million Hits In October!
A Brand New Record Here!
Advertise
Right Here
On OLP
Ad Rates As Low As Just $50 a Year
*************************************
OLP
Legal
Disclaimer
Guest Book
Table
Of Contents
Lists Every Page
All
Members
Of The Press
To translate text or
a web page go
to:
Language Tools
Google
Translations
Website
Submissions
Are
Gladly Accepted Here
****************************************
Is "CBD" A Possible
Cure For Breast Cancer?
And All The Other Many
Forms
Of Cancer's?
Learn
More About " CBD"
From a BBC News Report
Visit Our Sister Websites!
Listen Right Here Online!
To The Original 1930-50's
Reefer Madness
Radio
Shows And Programs
Maine
Patients Coalition
Online Store! Get Your Own
Pro- Medical Marijuana T-Shirt!
Selling Out Fast!
*************************************************
Evidence
Eliminator Software
"DOD" Secured Hard
Drive Wipes!
Download It Right Now. Before It's
To
Late To Protect Yourselve!
& No Possibility of Forensic Recovery
Evidence
Eliminator Is Rated,
Worlds
#1 PC Security Software!
Click
Here To Download A Free Demo
Of The " Evidence
Eliminator" Software
*********************************************
Navigational Links
OnlinePot's Main Home
Page
*************************************************
Parody
Cartoons & US
Government Grown Pot,
Term Papers,
School
Reports, & Thesis's On
Marijuana & Cannabis
****************************************
Amsterdam
A to Z
****************************************
Canadian
Websites
****************************************
Medical Marijuana, Cannabis
Topics Dealing
In California Main
Brand New Cali Section Start Page
Currently Under Construction
****************************************
Church's
& Pot Cannabis Marijuana
****************************************
Listings For Co-Ops,
Clinics, Dispensary's,
Buyers Clubs For MMJ
****************************************
Doctors & Clinics
****************************************
Cooking Recipes
****************************************
Drug
Testing A To Z
****************************************
Pot Games
****************************************
100's
Of Marijuana
Cannabis Grow Guides
****************************************
Latest Medical
Marijuana
Cannabis News Feeds
****************************************
All About Hash A- Z
****************************************
Cannabis
Legal Info,
State, Federal Laws, State
&
Federal Supreme Court Rulings
****************************************
Prisoners
Of The
Medical Marijuana
War!
****************************************
Other
MMJ Websites
****************************************
Medical
Marijuana
Studies,
Research
Report's, Medical
Cannabis Clinic Study's
****************************************
Tips To Help Avoid Being
Scammed
or Ripped Off Online
With Online Scammer's MOM's
& Other
Online Predators!
Just Updated!
****************************************
The Politics Of
Contraband
Medical Marijuana In The Mail
****************************************
The
"
Hall Of Shame" Section
All The Online Scammers, &
Thief's,
& Online MOM Predator's & Scammers
The MOM Scammers To Avoid Online
****************************************
Online Medical
Marijuana Patients
Online MOM Providers
****************************************
Medical
Marijuana
Patients Survey Form
****************************************
Politics,
Voters Rights
How To Contact Your
Local Area's Politicians
****************************************
Medical
Marijuana,
Cannabis Strains Info
****************************************
The Original OG
Marijuana Strain Guide
****************************************
Over
Grow's 800+
FAQ's:
Frequently Asked Questions
On Marijuana
Cultivation
****************************************
Marijuana & Pot Songs
Just Updated!
****************************************
Patients
Spiritual
Guidance,
Free Online
Crisis Help Center
****************************************
Award Winning Online
Marijuana Seed Banks
****************************************
Maximum
Computer
PC Security & Personal
Internet Security Tips
And Safety Guides
Just Updated!
****************************************
Traveling
Tips, & Guides
For Safer Traveling, B&B's,
Check Points, Do's & Don'ts
****************************************
Vaporizers
A To Z
****************************************
Marijuana
Cannabis
Online Video's & Movies
****************************************
1999-2009 Copyright ©
All Rights Reserved.
No part of this site maybe used or
reproduced in whole or in part
without
the written consent of the
Copyright
Owner Chris Kenoyer
www.onlinepot.org
OnlinePot assumes no legal
liability
for
any products, or
information or news
posted, services
offered,
Or any contests
or give away's offered.
| |
Bush/DEA Nixes Challenge to Ole Miss Monopoly Growing Pot for Research
Guns blazing as they head for the exit, the Bush gang has blasted the hopes of
Lyle
Craker, a UMass Amherst botany professor who applied in June, 2001 for a
DEA
license to grow marijuana for FDA-approved medical research. On Jan. 12, Craker
got a formal letter of denial from DEA Administrator Michele Leonhartt.
Mahmoud
ElSohly of the University of Mississippi remains America's only legal
grower, as far as
the feds are concerned. Some of the destructive regulations promulgated by Bush in
recent months may be
reversible, but the DEA's rejection of Craker appears to be
final. Lawyers
are exploring the appeal options, according to Rick Doblin, who
organized legal
and political support for Craker. Doblin didn't sound optimistic on
the
phone Jan. 13th 2009
Prof. Craker has already won an appeal -- but it didn't count, as we
shall explain.
His application had been rejected by the DEA in
December, 2004, following a three-and-a-half year "evaluation
process." With pro-bono help from DC lawyers and the ACLU, he appealed.
An extensive hearing was conducted by Administrative Law Judge Mary Ellen
Bittner at DEA headquarters in Arlington. Team Craker argued that
"the current system does not provide an adequate and uninterrupted supply
of marijuana for legitimate purposes," and "creating an alternative to
the current NIDA-controlled monopoly would promote the advancement of science
and research by adding competition without increasing the risk of
diversion."
The DEA called ElSohly, who spent December 13 and 14, 2005, defending his
monopoly. His testimony was revealing. Much of his work for the
government involves testing the potency of thousands of marijuana samples seized
by law enforcement agencies throughout the country. On his own time,
presumably, he has patented a THC-extract suppository, which a corporation
called Insys is trying to market. ( Can they think of a better slogan than
"Up yours, America?" ) El Sohly also has a contract with Mallinckrodt,
a giant chemical company that plans to market a THC-extract pill as an
alternative to Marinol ( which is synthetic THC in prescribable pill form ).
ElSohly testified that the marijuana he grows for NIDA meets all the needs of
U.S. researchers. His most recent crop, grown in the summer of 2002,
averaged about 7% THC. It was stored in drums lined with plastic in
refrigerated vaults. Upon getting word from NIDA that a researcher's
request had been granted, ElSohly sends a batch to the Research Triangle
Institute in North Carolina to be machine-rolled into cigarettes.
ElSohly testified that marijuana higher than 8% THC would gum up the rolling
machines. Moreover, he said, administrators from the University of
California's Center for Medicinal Cannabis Research had advised him that
patients in clinical trials could not tolerate marijuana with THC content above
8%. That's a dubious claim. In any case, one puff of an 8% THC
cigarette provides the same amount as two puffs a of 4%-THC cig. Clinical
trial protocols can be adjusted accordingly.
One of the recipients of ElSohly's NIDAwanna is Irvin Rosenfeld, a Ft.
Lauderdale stockbroker whose rare bone disorder qualified him for the
"Investigational New Drug Program" launched by the feds in the Carter
era ( and closed to new patients by Poppy Bush when AIDS patients began applying
en masse at the start of the '90s ). "I had a strong personal
interest in ElSohly's testimony," writes Rosenfeld in a forthcoming memoir.
"If the quality of government-issued medicine improved, I could smoke less,
and the mild side effects would be even milder.
"An aspect of medical marijuana use that the Drug Czar and other
Prohibitionists won't acknowledge is: the higher the concentration of THC and
other active ingredients, the smaller the amount required by the patient.
If the main adverse effect is damage to lung tissue -- as Ethan Russo and other
researchers have found -- then the less a patient has to smoke, the better.
Nevertheless, the government regularly issues warnings that 'today's pot is much
stronger than pot in the 1970s...' as if that made it more dangerous instead of
more efficient!"
One of ElSohly's self-serving contentions was that all marijuana studies should
be conducted with material similar in potency to the national average.
"What makes sense," he said, "is to look at the national data for
potency, for what's out there on the street, and... mimic what's out there
and to do research with those kinds of materials."
That approach would be reasonable if the focus of research was harm, not medical
benefit; and indeed, almost all the marijuana research NIDA has sponsored over
the years has been aimed at finding adverse effects. For those studies,
using marijuana comparable to what most Americans are smoking might make sense.
But for research aimed at finding beneficial effects, scientists should be
provided with the highest-grade strains, not the national average.
Judge Bittner was not impressed by ElSohly's arguments. On Feb.12, 2007,
she issued her opinion, which concluded that competition among producers would
be in the public interest. DEA lawyers had argued that the existing
arrangement involved competition because Craker ( and others ) could submit a
bid against ElSohly every five years when the NIDA contract came up for renewal.
Bittner observed, "The NIDA contract requires the contractor to analyze
samples of marijuana supplied by law enforcement agencies, a separate activity
from cultivating marijuana for research purposes, and a requirement a qualified
cultivator may not be able to fulfill."
So Craker won his appeal... but when the name of the game is
Administrative Law, nobody wins except the government agency. The judge
doesn't decide how the agency must act, her opinion is merely a recommendation
that the agency chief can accept, reject, or modify. DEA Administrator
Leonhartt and her predecessor, Karen Tandy, sat on ALJ Bittner's opinion for 23
months, and then shot it down, along with the hopes of many drug policy
reformers. The record contained letters of support for Craker from
Massachusetts Senators John Kerry and Ted Kennedy and 45 members of Congress.
"As each day got closer to January 20," Doblin said ruefully, "I
couldn't help thinking they might punt it over to the Obama
Administration."
Granting a license to a second grower of marijuana for federally approved
research seems like the kind of small step away from prohibition that the Obama
Administration might be willing to make.
As this goes off to CounterPunch Jan. 15 -- the day the DEA decision re
Craker was published in the Federal Register -- Rick Doblin reports that the
lawyers see a ray of hope: "DEA makes a big deal in their final ruling that
rejection of the FDA-approved protocols of Donald Abrams and Ethan Russo took
place before the current HHS Guidelines were issued. DEA claims that since
no rejections have taken place after the guidelines were in force, there is no
evidence that it is difficult or impossible for an FDA-approved researcher to
obtain marijuana from NIDA. The HHS 1999 Guidelines were issued May 21,
1999. Russo's protocol was approved by FDA in September 1999 and rejected
by NIDA/HHS in December 1999, with the written rejection received in February
2000. We may submit this as new evidence."
A Note on the Coverage
A brief story about the DEA turning down Craker ran in the Boston Globe Jan.
13. It made no reference to the political significance of the timing.
Reporter Bina Venkataraman portrayed the whole process and outcome as quite
rational: "The DEA decision called the current supply of marijuana for
research 'adequate and uninterrupted' and said a second laboratory would not be
in the public interest. Since 1968, a federally approved laboratory at the
University of Mississippi's School of Pharmacy has grown nearly a hundred
varieties of marijuana plants... The plants have been used for clinical
studies across the country."
Venkataraman made Rick Doblin out to be a bit of a spinmeister: "Doblin...
calls the Mississippi lab a monopoly." When one company controls all the
business, it is a monopoly. She falsely summarized and minimized
criticisms of ElSohly's operation: "Some researchers complain that access
to the laboratory's supply is thwarted by a contract it holds with the National
Institute on Drug Abuse, which must approve permits issued by the Food and Drug
Administration or the DEA in a process that can take months to complete."
Months? The right word would have been "years" or "a
lifetime." And would-be researchers have many complaints in addition to the
length of the approval process.
By some strange coincidence -- or was it the Ol' Miss p.r. machine, or
NIDA's? -- the New York Times ran a flattering interview with ElSohly on Dec.
23, shortly before the DEA announced it was upholding his monopoly. No
mention was made of Craker's application or ElSohly's opposition to it. I
emailed the interviewer, Claudia Dreifus, to ask at whose initiative the piece
was written, but didn't hear back. I met Claudia in New York in 1970.
She had just published an article about A.J. Weberman, who used to go
through Bob Dylan's garbage cans on MacDougal Street. One time Dylan, who
had a family and his own privacy to protect, caught Weberman and dealt with him
appropriately. Weberman shared his happy recollection of the encounter
with Claudia: "All I could think of was 'Bob Dylan is beating the shit out
of me.'"
Here she is, all these years later, a professor at Columbia University and a
regular in the New York Times Science section, lobbing softballs to Mahmoud
ElSohly. Comments in italics are by your correspondent.
Dreifus: What exactly does the Marijuana Project do?
ElSohly: At this laboratory, which began in 1968, we often investigate
marijuana's chemistry. We also have a farm where we grow cannabis for
federally approved researchers. Our material is employed in clinical
studies around the country, to see if the active ingredient in this plant is
useful for pain, nausea, glaucoma, for AIDS patients and so on.
[italics] The image is of a panoply of clinical trials being conducted in the
U.S. -- a key point The DEA Administrator made in rejecting Craker's
application.
Dreifus: One of the basic principles of agronomy is to start with good seeds.
Where do your seeds come from?
ElSohly. That's a very good question.
[italics] Patronizing. He realizes she's not a science whiz.
Most of the illicit material in the 1960s came from Mexico. So, in
collaboration with the D.E.A. and the Mexican government, we acquired
those seeds. Later, we acquired others from Colombia, Thailand, Jamaica,
India, Pakistan and places in the Middle East. That permitted us to study
chemical and botanical differences. By 1976, we were growing about 96
different varieties.
Interestingly, that led us to see that there was only one species of cannabis.
It had always been thought that there were many. But you could see that
the chemistry of this plant is the same qualitatively no matter where it comes
from.
[italics] He's claiming undue credit. The one-species theory dates back to
Linnaeus The modern paper usually cited in this regard is: Small, Beckstead and
Chan. 1975. The evolution of cannabinoid phenotypes in Cannabis.
Economic Botany 29:219-232. All three authors were based in Canada, grew
their own plants and ran their own analytic lab tests.
What makes each different is the relative proportion of the different chemicals
in there, which doesn't make a different species. It's really the same
species, but different varieties of it. The different types of varieties
hybridize very easily.
Dreifus: Does this mean that one could make genetically modified cannabis?
ElSohly: Yes. Absolutely. That actually has been the trend over the
years in the cultivation in the illicit market, and also in the legal market,
where we are doing genetic selection, where we select specific materials that
have the genes that produce higher levels of THC or some of the other
ingredients.
[italics] Apparently she means to invoke Monsanto-style Frankenfood genetic
modification and he's talking about Mendelian genetics and selective breeding.
Dreifus: So out there in rural Northern California, have they been improving
their crops with modern genetics?
ElSohly: They have been doing genetic selection for years. You can see the
potency keeps going up. In the 1970s, the seized marijuana had probably 1
percent or less of the active ingredient. Now, it's about 8 percent, on
the average.
[italics] Some enlightened California dispensary operators have begun using an
analytic test lab to determine cannabinoid levels and to check for the presence
of mold. According to Steve DeAngelo of Oakland's Harborside Dispensary,
"The cannabis that an experienced user would consider ordinary, we're
finding, is in the 10%-THC range. Cannabis considered strong would be
20%-THC or higher."
Dreifus: How did you come to your unusual specialty?
ElSohly: The honest truth is
[italics] Don't you always tell it like it is, Dr. ElSohly?
that it began out of necessity. In 1975, while I was in my last year of
graduate school in natural products chemistry at the University of Pittsburgh,
the Lord provided me with twin daughters...
[italics] Didn't Mrs. E. have anything to do with it?
[italics] Sorry to sound catty. I've met ElSohly's family, his offspring
seemed well-adjusted and gorgeous. But his defense of his monopoly has
been unseemly, to put it mildly, and the role of the corporate media in
upholding marijuana prohibition is reprehensible. Their basic trick is to
cover the subject sporadically, assigning reporters who have to make a fast,
superficial study of the subject and can barely understand, let alone convey,
the connections between legal, political, and scientific developments...
Note how assertions made by ElSohly to Claudia D. wound up in the
reporting of Bina V... The Times owns the Globe. Maybe they're
applying economies of scale, saving money on facts.
Pubdate: Fri, 16 Jan 2009
Source: CounterPunch (US Web)
Copyright: 2009 CounterPunch
|
